Blogging with Parliamentary Allowance

MPs who blog are being censored by the Commons authorities - if they use the £10,000 Communications Allowance to pay for it.
A Labour MP says he has been stripped of a Parliamentary allowance for making fun of other MPs on his blog.
Paul Flynn was told to remove posts including ones calling ex-Labour minister Peter Hain a “shapeshifter” and Lib Dem MP Lembit Opik a “clown”.
When Mr Flynn refused he had part of his communications allowance removed.
Other MPs have complained of the Commons trying to “censor” their blogs but the authorities say there are rules on using public money for “propaganda”. (BBC)
There is one very very simple way around it for MPs: Pay for your blog yourself!
Blogging is not an expensive activity. It can be done for nothing with sites such as Blogger and Wordpress, or relatively cheaply with a self-hosted package that gives you far greater control over your blog.
It seems that Paul Flynn has had to go down that route, paying the £250 it costs to run his site each year himself, and has posted this at the botom of his website:
This website is NOT funded by the House of Commons Communication Allowance and is free to express uninhibited views that are not censored by Commons officials.
First comments on that: £250 seems pretty steep for running costs, and secondly: welcome to the real world where you have to actually pay for these sort of things yourself, rather than have the taxpayer pay for them.















In a rare moment, I am going to admit that John Redwood has something right. At the bottom of his blog, there is the disclaimer
Given that Blogger and Wordpress.com are free to use, it seems unreasonable to ask taxpayers to fund blogs. It mightn’t be a bad for the Parliamentary Estate to buy a server for MPs to put their contact and surgery information online; they could even keep the domain name and point it to their own server when they’re no longer in Parliament.
xD.
Dave Cole´s last blog post..Towards sixty senate seats