Conservatives.com
The new Conservative website looks quite pretty. It is far prettier than the old version, certainly, and has more and better information on it. However, it is really quite “safe” in the end, and nothing is really very “eye grabbing” in aesthetic terms.
There is a nice number of sections on the site, such as policy, “where you live“, and the Conservative Wall.
Plus the Blue Blog. With the blog, however, I would have liked to see it looking that bit different to the rest of the site, to make it look a little more individual. It really needs to be plugged far more than it is and linked to from all pages. But how useful it is will depend on the frequency and quality of the posts made - which is something to be evaluated in the future. [One change that needs to be amde now is is a bit of spelling correction - "comments" has two only two letter m's - not three.]
The real test of the site, however, will depend on the content and how it kept updated. Content is king for a political website - it needs to b kept constantly up-to-date and be interactive. The Wall just isn’t all that interactive.
Overall, I’d give the site about 8/10.
Compared to the new Labourand Lib Demsites, however, there is no denying that it is the most impressive.








A pair of quotes that I didn’t dare post as a main article:
Garbo: “Men are on the prowl for some pretty young PR thing and women, usually outnumbered, often oblige.”
Shazia Awan (on the Blue Blog): “I’m certainly looking forward to not being a conference virgin anymore.”
I still don’t know what Garbo looks like, but he’ll be the one skulking off into the corner with person or persons not yet identified.
Or that’s my story.
Matt
Matt Wardman’s last blog post..Conservatives.com
Ha ha! I refute all allegations. Whatever they might be.