This wouldn’t have happened under Campbell: Politics Decoded Conference Special with Garbo

By Garbo • September 26, 2008

Daniel Finkelstein’s post about banning drinking amongst Tory MPs at next week’s conference is a clear attack aimed at the No.10 officials who were allegedly drunk at 3am on the morning of THAT announcement, as Guido points out. I say allegedly, but I have it on good authority that at least some of these key decision makers had had too much to drink - some by their own admission. It all ties in rather nicely with my “behind the scenes” post yesterday.

This is a very serious point though. It really does show what a mess No.10 is in, and perhaps a reshuffle next week should be more far reaching than a few cabinet members.

Of course, this would never had happened in Alastair Campbell’s day - not just because he is such a ruthless professional, but he is also tea total. Whatever anybody thinks of him, Labour could really do with Alastair Cambell back in charge of running communications again for No.10.

Article Series - Politics Decoded 2008-9 by Garbo

Previous in series Next in series

If you liked this post, then please consider subscribing to the Wardman Wire RSS Feed. You can also subscribe by email.

Categories: All WW, Labour, Party Conferences 2008, Politicker, Politics Decoded
Tags: Alastair Cambell, Drinking, Ruth Kelly resignation

About the Author

Garbo

I am political enthusiast working in the politics industry in Westminster. Having written for various blogs in the past, including my own now defunct blog "The Poliblogs", I have trimmed down my blogging time to my weekly column on the Wardman Wire: Politics Decoded. I do not take a partisan view of politics and reserve the right to be critical of all parties and also offer the odd bit of praise when I am feeling generous. I can be contacted directly on poliblogsAThotmail.co.uk for all queries including media and blogging inquiries.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

4 Comments »

Comment by Dave Cole

2008-09-26 11:00:56

Unfortunately, Campbell has said that, while he’s happy to help the party, he’s not coming back to his old job.

There has been little coverage of the fact that Kelly has been wanting to pack it in for some time.

xD.

Reply to this comment

Comment by Garbo

2008-09-26 11:10:27

Dave, I have little doubt that Kelly wanted to pack it in for some time and that the reason is, at least in part, about wanting to spend more time with her kids. I also think she is no Gordon Brown fan which made it an easy decision to make and that next week’s shuffle is a good time to go.

The main reason there is such suspicion over this is partly because the media want to portray it as an open rebellion, but mainly because the No.10 officials held a press conference at 3 in the morning?! It is a baffling strategy and adds weight to the media’s suspicions unnecessarily.

As I say, this would not have happened under Campbell; and as you rightly say he is very, very unlikely to come back. But the team still needs a shake up as it clearly is in disarray.

Reply to this comment

Comment by Dave Cole

2008-09-26 12:19:48

I’m not sure that it wouldn’t have happened under Campbell. Someone screwed up; I think it was that, rather than malice. They wanted, that having happened, to draw the poison and as far as possible kill the story.

xD.

Dave Cole’s last blog post..Oyster on mobiles

Reply to this comment

Comment by Garbo

2008-09-26 19:14:09

I certainly don’t think it was malice either… but I do think it was incompetence.

I do still think Campbell would have handled this differently - not only would he not have been drunk, but he ran a much tighter ship. This isn’t the first time the No.10 machine has made a mess of things in the past few months.

Reply to this comment