<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matt Wardman on Radio Wales Good Evening Wales about Civil Service Bloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/08/04/matt-wardman-on-radio-wales-good-evening-wales-about-civil-service-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/08/04/matt-wardman-on-radio-wales-good-evening-wales-about-civil-service-bloggers/</link>
	<description>Politics, Commentary, Culture, Technology.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/08/04/matt-wardman-on-radio-wales-good-evening-wales-about-civil-service-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-9356</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 10:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/08/04/matt-wardman-on-radio-wales-good-evening-wales-about-civil-service-bloggers/#comment-9356</guid>
		<description>I find it almost incredible (as in not believable) that people aren't cottoning on to the stink bloggers et al raise when blocks like this are put in place. One wonders if the political staff (as opposed to the WAG civil service) are also blocked from reading political blogs.

The mindset about blogging needs to change. While the openness I'd like to see probably isn't going to be universally accepted in the near future, it'd be something if the powers-that-be realised that blogs, for the most part, aren't a problem unless you make them a problem.

xD.

Dave Coles last blog post..&lt;a href='http://davecole.org/blog/2008/08/06/im-ba-ack/' rel="nofollow"&gt;I&#8217;m ba-ack!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it almost incredible (as in not believable) that people aren&#8217;t cottoning on to the stink bloggers et al raise when blocks like this are put in place. One wonders if the political staff (as opposed to the WAG civil service) are also blocked from reading political blogs.</p>
<p>The mindset about blogging needs to change. While the openness I&#8217;d like to see probably isn&#8217;t going to be universally accepted in the near future, it&#8217;d be something if the powers-that-be realised that blogs, for the most part, aren&#8217;t a problem unless you make them a problem.</p>
<p>xD.</p>
<p>Dave Coles last blog post..<a href='http://davecole.org/blog/2008/08/06/im-ba-ack/' rel="nofollow">I&rsquo;m ba-ack!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valleysmam</title>
		<link>http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/08/04/matt-wardman-on-radio-wales-good-evening-wales-about-civil-service-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-9296</link>
		<dc:creator>valleysmam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 06:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/08/04/matt-wardman-on-radio-wales-good-evening-wales-about-civil-service-bloggers/#comment-9296</guid>
		<description>This extends not only to civil servants and the likes of Miss Wagstaff. I was bounced from Facebook months ago for the same reason and yet saw many that had obviously made up screen names. Most of us have these, as if we expressed what we say under our own names, we would be economically disadvantaged,
Those of us in the private sector, where we are suppliers of goods and services to government, local and WAG, and often wider would be commercially blacklisted by some in influential positions. This is often the case with the voluntary and community secctors, where organisations have lost funding if they "upset" a minister or an offical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This extends not only to civil servants and the likes of Miss Wagstaff. I was bounced from Facebook months ago for the same reason and yet saw many that had obviously made up screen names. Most of us have these, as if we expressed what we say under our own names, we would be economically disadvantaged,<br />
Those of us in the private sector, where we are suppliers of goods and services to government, local and WAG, and often wider would be commercially blacklisted by some in influential positions. This is often the case with the voluntary and community secctors, where organisations have lost funding if they &#8220;upset&#8221; a minister or an offical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
