Quantum Blogging: Touching Base by David Keen
Science and God, despite Richard Dawkins attempts to break them up, haven’t stopped dating. Most flirtatious of the lot is physics. At the level of the cosmos, there is an emerging consensus that the universe appears ‘fine tuned’ for life. Had the Big Bang been stronger or weaker by roughly 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% (*) then there would be no habitable universe. And that’s just the Big Bang, never mind all the other factors.
At the micro level, quantum physics keeps throwing up weird and wonderful results. One of the best known, and culturally significant, is the ‘observer effect’ - that the presence of an observer changes the results of what you’re looking at.
(*) Ed: 10 orders of magnitude have been removed in the error margins on the strength of the Big Bang to avoid my web page layout being broken.
Seeing Through Others Eyes
Most of us rely on other eyes and ears for the events we can’t see and hear. TV, press, blogs, online news sources, or just asking around our mates. And those eyes and ears can change the way we see those events. Two examples:
- This weeks crime stats which revealed that the risk of being a victim of crime is at its lowest ever level, and that recorded crime has dropped by nearly half since 1995. At the same time, 2/3 of us think crime is rising. Why? To be completely unscientific for a moment, we listen to the Today Programme over breakfast, and roughly ever other day I find myself talking loudly over a news item so that our small kids don’t hear about the latest ‘brutal stabbing’ or discovery of body parts on Jersey. Crime is news, and knife crime is big news at the moment, so it gets reported.
Crime seems to pay on TV too - during the last 7 days, you could catch the following on primetime TV: Foyles War; Midsomer Murders; Police Camera, Action!; Send in the Dogs (on police dogs); The Bill (twice); and A Touch of Frost. All about crime - real or fictional - and this is the output of just one channel, ITV1.
Good News is No News
The constant stream of news about crime sends a daily message that the once-a-year crime stats can’t compete with.
After all, ‘man decides not to burgle house’ isn’t news. And because lack of crime isn’t news, it can’t be symbolic either. The Dewsbury abduction case earlier this year came to stand for more than just one messed up family, and was seized on by many as a symptom of a broken and lawless society. A running story, kept going by on-site journalists and off-site commentators (myself included). I struggle to think of an equivalent story of goodness and lawfulness which got the same coverage.
The Canterbury Coconut-Shy
The second example is the Lambeth Conference, the 10-yearly gathering of Anglican bishops from around the world. Bloggers and journalists are queueing up to report the latest scandals, splits and attacks on Rowan Williams. Frustratingly for most of them, the conference seems to be going well, and there is a decided lack of news. Jim Naughton comments:
To succeed fully, the bishops of the Lambeth Conference must avoid committing news. Any truly newsworthy development initiated by the bishops now gathered at Canterbury would represent a premature attempt to close questions not yet ready for resolution. Left to their own devices, the bishops might just be able to pull this off, but the bishops will not be left to their own devices. There will be a vast horde of media at the conference, and they will have to justify their presence by coming up with stories
Here is the observer effect in action. The journalists require ’stories’, and bloggers like me need something to blog about. If there are no stories, what happens? The machine keeps going - when was the last time the 10.00 news was cancelled or shortened for lack of items? And there is a ready supply of stones for the smooth Lambeth pond, supplied by those who weren’t invited but still came, and those who were invited but didn’t. The overall impression is of a church at war with itself, which contains some truth, but is just as much about a commenting community that would rather report the war than the peace.
One Argument Please, Short and Quotable.
Dissident groups are a godsend for the wordsmiths. Monty Python had a great sketch about a man seeking an argument, all he’d need to do today is log on. But because the argumentative make good news, they are given publicity way beyond their status. The National Secular Society has a very small membership, but because they guarantee an argument with anyone religious, they get quoted (example).
What Are We Doing?
The observer effect can go both ways. As a vocation, journalism is about unearthing and telling the truth, and the best journalism brings truth to light in the service of others. Matt’s Zimbabwe series is a case in point. But there is a line crossed where reporting stops serving the truth and starts serving the story. The UK economy is a case in point - there’s no doubt that things are getting worse, with rising inflation and jobless, falling house prices etc. But could we talk ourselves into recession? A big story arc which reads ‘downturn’ seeks out stories which fit the big story, even if that’s not the whole story. So even as retail spending surges, and millions jet off on holiday, we keep on talking about how bad things are going to get. The ‘downturn’ story requires feeding to keep it alive, but the very act of feeding it creates a climate where a downturn is more likely.
…And Who For?
The temptation for bloggers and journalists is to feed stories and chase traffic, rather than chase truth and rest between meals. We can become self-serving. To come back to a regular Touching Base theme, we need a quantum of Sabbath, a routine which takes us out of the waterfall of words every so often, to evaluate what we’re doing, and ask who it really serves.
David Keen blogs at St. Aidan to Abbey Manor, and behaves differently when being observed.


Oh dear the fine-tuned myth …. just because we live in a universe that we evolved in doesn’t mean that someone created it - there’s nothing to stop all those other universes in which we couldn’t live existing and it would be rather more of a miracle if we were living in one of those that this one wouldn’t it. The trouble with god-botherers in general is they can’t just accept that humans are little different from any other random collection of cosmic strings (or whatever is the current fashion in pyhsics) as far as the universe is concerned they have this need to pretend they are special.
Baht Ats last blog post..Well well
BTW 10^-60 % doesn’t break your format unless you want to write it out in the silly way people without a maths O’level have to.
Baht Ats last blog post..Well well
>BTW 10^-60 % doesn’t break your format unless you want to write it out in the silly way people without a maths O’level have to.
I took the 0.0000…00001% as a use of the form for emphasis … and it’s not for me to interfere with the artistic self-expression of authors ;-*).
Matt
I’ll leave this one for the author !
Matt
Oh dear, the multiverse myth. Apart from a few books by Philip Pullman (who got the idea from CS Lewis, among others), the idea that there might be plenty of universes existing in parallel is an idea from sci-fi, not real life.
Lifelong atheist philosopher Anthony Flew found the evidence for fine tuning (among other things) enough to make him change his mind about the possibility of a God. He even wrote a book about it: http://www.amazon.com/There-God-Notorious-Atheist-Changed/dp/0061335290.
David Keens last blog post..What church leaders really discuss