Quantcast

Christopher Glamorganshire sacking story cut and paste Promotional Tour

Interesting. Person or persons unknown attempted to draw our attention to the fact that Wales Online has the Christopher Glamorgan sacking story first by posting a comment across almost 20 blogs last week.

This is the Comment:

Did you know Christopher Glamorganshire? What’s the gossip?

with this original article on Wales Online linked on some occasions:

Sacked Blogger takes case to Tribunal

These are 16 or so the blogs where I have seen a comment. Does anyone have the ip address?

“Link” indicates where there was a link to the Wales Online article posted.

There were also these two where they don’t publish the Timestamp.

I’d guess there may be some more where it didn’t get through.

Neither Orodvicius nor me had this comment on our articles.

Hmmm. More on this later.

[Update 1: 13/7 19:45. Change title to be more representative.]
[Update 2: 14/7 11:30. Two more added - Cynical Dragon and Sadie's Tavern.]

Series Navigation«Dooced Welsh Civil Service Blogger goes to Industrial TribunalChristopher Glamorganshire: Questions to be Answered»

About the Author

admin

Matt is an internet consultant, commentator, freelance writer and Project Manager based in the UK. He is available for hire. Matt edits the Wardman Wire, and writes at Poligeeks, Total Politics, and occasionally in several other places.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

8 Comments »

Comment by paul canning
2008-07-13 20:10:05

neither on mine. Obviously a first-year journo. bit obvious trawling.

 
Comment by admin Subscribed to comments via email
2008-07-13 22:58:22

The most likely motive I can see is that someone wanted to make sure that the Western Mail (i.e., walesonline.co.uk) got credited with the story.

The selection of blogs is interesting - why The Thunderdragon and Mars Hill, great blogs - but neither really does “Wales” nor is hugely prominent.

A bit more digging before I comment further.

 
Comment by Alwyn ap Huw Subscribed to comments via email
2008-07-13 23:25:31

It does seem a bit odd that the poster didn’t leave his comment on any blogs that carried the story with links to the article!

Could the poster be Chris or a friend of his who just wanted to make sure that the story had maximum publicity, rather than a journalist trying to hype up the story?

Alwyn ap Huws last blog post..Lembit loses in love again

 
Comment by David Subscribed to comments via email
2008-07-14 09:51:08

I had someone post that at my place. Saw it all over the place as well.

If this is what walesonline thinks ‘citizen journalism’ then they’re doomed.

Davids last blog post..Lembo back on the prowl

 
Comment by admin Subscribed to comments via email
2008-07-14 11:08:59

Alwyn>
It does seem a bit odd that the poster didn’t leave his comment on any blogs that carried the story with links to the article!

I haven’t actually checked that all the way through yet.

Will update when I have .

 
Comment by admin Subscribed to comments via email
2008-07-14 11:11:25

Cynical Dragon>I had someone post that at my place. Saw it all over the place as well.

You too? That’s another two this morning that I missed. Ditto Sadie.

 
Comment by Che Grav-ara
2008-07-15 12:51:28

I had it aswell. Back in the day I remember that Christopher Glamorgan himself used to troll the blogs leaving the same comments over and over. Just a thought

Che Grav-aras last blog post..Trial By Public

Comment by admin Subscribed to comments via email
2008-07-15 17:29:26

>Back in the day I remember that Christopher Glamorgan himself used to troll the blogs leaving the same comments over and over.

That’s quite possible of course, but two things make me put a question mark on the possibility which should be noted for fairness:

1 - Several of the comments are on pieces reporting the story themselves - which tends to point towards an attempt to claim the source not simply push the story.

2 - Several of the comments include broken links (I’ll make a point of going through this evening and noting which ones they are). I’d expect a blogger to be more efficient.

Of course, either it could be a competent conspirator trying to make it look like an inefficient conspiracy, but that way lies a reinforcing spiral of speculation which will end up with someone vanishing up their own bottom - so I’ll leave it that line alone.

I’m really just noting what has happened, making the point to whom it may concern that it is actually far better to do it openly on the blogs (”Oi. Thay’s my scoop”), or privately by email so we can all say “x has asked me to cover this story”.

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Comments will be sent to the moderation queue.

Trackback responses to this post