<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Suing For The Right Not To Do Your Job</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/05/18/suing-for-the-right-not-to-do-your-job/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/05/18/suing-for-the-right-not-to-do-your-job/</link>
	<description>Politics, Commentary, Culture, Technology.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: garbo</title>
		<link>http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/05/18/suing-for-the-right-not-to-do-your-job/#comment-8430</link>
		<dc:creator>garbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 11:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/05/18/suing-for-the-right-not-to-do-your-job/#comment-8430</guid>
		<description>I pretty much agree with you here Mr Dragon - though I can't help thinking "so what?"  Surely the real issue is if this person wins their case?  

Right now this is just a story about someone wanting to sue - and I back them too.  They have every right to sue and if they win then either there is something wrong with the legislation or the courts haven't done their job - but only in my opinion, of course.

This is an interesting story though - how far should employers hanker to people's personal beliefs?  I agree in this case that this person should just go and get another job.  But what about when certain local councils who try and undermine Christmas celebrations amongst their employees? Do you support that action too in the name of secularism? Where do you draw line?  

After all, if there other people to do the civil partnerships, shouldn't a council be flexible to meet the needs of it's employees?  Devil's advocate, perhaps, but we meet the needs of parents these days and plenty of other groups and work their personal lives around their professional lives. Why not with religious groups too?

Where do you draw line in all this?  

I am not sure whether councils have a fixed position on whether they are secular or not anyway.  I was always of the understanding that this is a multi-cultural society and that our public bodies are therefore too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pretty much agree with you here Mr Dragon - though I can&#8217;t help thinking &#8220;so what?&#8221;  Surely the real issue is if this person wins their case?  </p>
<p>Right now this is just a story about someone wanting to sue - and I back them too.  They have every right to sue and if they win then either there is something wrong with the legislation or the courts haven&#8217;t done their job - but only in my opinion, of course.</p>
<p>This is an interesting story though - how far should employers hanker to people&#8217;s personal beliefs?  I agree in this case that this person should just go and get another job.  But what about when certain local councils who try and undermine Christmas celebrations amongst their employees? Do you support that action too in the name of secularism? Where do you draw line?  </p>
<p>After all, if there other people to do the civil partnerships, shouldn&#8217;t a council be flexible to meet the needs of it&#8217;s employees?  Devil&#8217;s advocate, perhaps, but we meet the needs of parents these days and plenty of other groups and work their personal lives around their professional lives. Why not with religious groups too?</p>
<p>Where do you draw line in all this?  </p>
<p>I am not sure whether councils have a fixed position on whether they are secular or not anyway.  I was always of the understanding that this is a multi-cultural society and that our public bodies are therefore too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattWardman</title>
		<link>http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/05/18/suing-for-the-right-not-to-do-your-job/#comment-8429</link>
		<dc:creator>MattWardman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 10:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/05/18/suing-for-the-right-not-to-do-your-job/#comment-8429</guid>
		<description>@Simon Sarmiento: I've stuck my oar in and made the change.

(Having said that I can think of plenty of sectarian public organisations !)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Simon Sarmiento: I&#8217;ve stuck my oar in and made the change.</p>
<p>(Having said that I can think of plenty of sectarian public organisations !)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Sarmiento</title>
		<link>http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/05/18/suing-for-the-right-not-to-do-your-job/#comment-8423</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Sarmiento</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 16:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/05/18/suing-for-the-right-not-to-do-your-job/#comment-8423</guid>
		<description>I think you must mean "secular" not "sectarian".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you must mean &#8220;secular&#8221; not &#8220;sectarian&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 4.915 seconds -->
