<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MPs and Democracy: We The People</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/02/07/mps-and-democracy-we-the-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/02/07/mps-and-democracy-we-the-people/</link>
	<description>Politics, Commentary, Culture, Technology.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/02/07/mps-and-democracy-we-the-people/#comment-6495</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2008/02/07/mps-and-democracy-we-the-people/#comment-6495</guid>
		<description>Thanks, TD.

Where do you see the limits of representative democracy? The example I am thinking about is the current Treaty/Constitution, where (depending on your view) our delegates may be changing the terms of their delegation.

Is that acceptable, and under what circumstances?

Matt W</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, TD.</p>
<p>Where do you see the limits of representative democracy? The example I am thinking about is the current Treaty/Constitution, where (depending on your view) our delegates may be changing the terms of their delegation.</p>
<p>Is that acceptable, and under what circumstances?</p>
<p>Matt W</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
