Quantcast

Independent Schools: Regulation of

After my post mentioning the Nottingham High School yesterday, I thought I would make a Prefect headcount:

  • Nottingham High School Prefects 1955: 19
  • Nottingham High School Prefects 1980-81: 37

Why does regulation always breed like rabbits? Or does it just reflect a growth in entropy?

I should add 3 notes:

  • Miss Wagstaff will be pleased to know that she had a namesake in the 1955 cohort.
  • The 1980-1 figures ignore 93 (ninety-three) “House Prefects” listed in the School Record, which - bearing in mind that the annual intake was something like 120 boys - seems to be a hell of a lot. House Prefects are (-ish) to Prefects roughly what Mrs Thatcher’s “little Bishops” were to the “big Bishops“.
  • I don’t have figures for the school attendance in 1955.

Tags: , , [tags], , [/tags]

About the Author

admin

Matt is an internet consultant, commentator, freelance writer and Project Manager based in the UK. He is available for hire. Matt edits the Wardman Wire, and writes at Poligeeks, Total Politics, and occasionally in several other places.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

1 Comment »

Comment by poons Subscribed to comments via email
2008-02-05 01:55:38

My school (Birkenhead Insitute High School) made all six formers prefects, so could the increase be down to an increase in those staying on after 16?

Stock crap joke :

3rd year pupil : Why are you called a prefect?
Six Former : Because I’m nearly perfect.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Comments will be sent to the moderation queue.

Trackback responses to this post