Ming the Meek, Tory Triumphalists, Brown the Bully & Age is just a Number: Politics Decoded
Not too old, just no good
Today I was going to write about the imminent departure of Sir Ming Campbell as leader of the Lib Dems – but it appears he has jumped the gun somewhat and beaten me to it. It is widely reported that Ming was just too old for the job and had to go. However, I think this assessment is unfair. Ming wasn’t too old for the job – he was just not very good at it.
Of course, it didn’t help that he looked like Mr Burn’s old brother and that behind his sixty-six years belied a man of what appeared to be one hundred and six, but a good leader is a good leader is a good leader. I imagine if Iain Duncan-Smith had been fifteen years older we would all have put his ineffective leadership down to age as well – as it happened he was a young man (in political terms) and so his failure as a leader was just taken at face value. Winston Churchill was pushing seventy by the time of the battle of Britain – but no-one gave a damn about that as he gave Hitler and the Luftwaffe a lesson in leadership.
OK – so times have moved on and Blair has almost come to characterise what a PM should look like but I still don’t buy the argument that even if you are good enough for the job but over fifty five then forget it. The truth is Ming was ineffective and was always going to be a failure from the first time he asked a question at PMQs as acting leader about acting headmasters only to be met by apoplectic laughter. I’m sure Ming is nice guy, in fact I’m sure he’s a good guy, but you need more than that to lead a party in the House of Commons. Ming just did not have it and I doubt he ever did.
What now for the Tories?
So what now for the Lib Dems? Or should the question be so what now for the Tories? The next step for the Lib Dems is to elect home affairs spokesman Nick Clegg – it’s a no brainer. However what impact will this have on the Tories? The Tories must be a little nervous at the proposition of Ming going – he was virtually their trump card. The Tories would do well to stop gloating so much and really give the next few months a real push to secure their ground in the polls. As I have been saying ever since the Tory surge in the polls a couple of weeks ago, the Tory vote has largely come from the Lib Dems, the Labour vote has held fairly strong, never dropping below 38%.
Nick Clegg will be a popular leader and will get far more attention that Ming did and will be far more effective at attracting back the Tory vote. He is shrewd politician and will have some genuine policies up his sleeve. While Ming liked to bang on about the environment and latterly fixed term parliaments (all good causes but hardly vote winners), Clegg will add some weight to the Lib Dem manifesto. It won’t lead to them soaring in the polls, but it will probably put them back in the low 20s. In which case, the Tories will be back down in the low 30s and Labour will have a comfortable lead in the polls again. I wonder if Brown regrets ruling out that May election, he can’t seem to get anything right…
EU can’t fool us, Mr Brown
The time to Gordon Brown signing the EU Treaty is drawing ever closer. The way Brown has handled this whole affair is another example of his poor strategic nous. He knows full well that this treaty is no different from the constitution – even his party is saying so. Yet he thought he could fool the electorate by saying it was different. Now he has seen that we aren’t as dumb as he’d hoped, he is trying to say that if he can not secure the red lines then we will have a referendum. I presume he will be voting no in that referendum if he doesn’t secure the red lines? The fact is whatever happens we won’t be getting a referendum because Brown knows he will lose. The only thing worse than that would be going to a referendum anyway and being seen as changing policy again on the back of Tory pressure. The man is playing party politics with our sovereignty and it is not on.
You’re never too old
A MORI poll in 2004 was conducted to try and discover who Britain’s greatest PM of all time was. Here is the top ten –
- Clement Attlee
- Winston Churchill
- David Lloyd George
- Margaret Thatcher
- Harold Macmillan
- Tony Blair
- Herbert Asquith
- Stanley Baldwin
- Harold Wilson
- Lord Salisbury
Note – Clement Attlee was 62 when he came to office and Winston Churchill was 66. He was then re-elected at the grand old age of 77. Ming, you were a mere whipper-snapper.
Article Series - Column - Politics Decoded - Garbo
- Political Fads & Supermarket Trolleys: Politics Decoded
- Be Merciless to Ming, Taxing Times & Anyone Fancy a Flutter?: Politics Decoded
- Unflash Gordon, Election Speculation & Two Jabs: Politics Decoded
- Time for a Radical Change?
- Olympic Role model or British Embarrassment
- Political Predictions
- Ignore the polls, it’s the economy stupid!
- Very pleased to meet you…
- The Greatest Confidence Trick ever? Lucky Brown & PM Trivia: Politics Decoded
- How it was meant to be, the biggest losers & white lies: Politics Decoded
- Ming the Meek, Tory Triumphalists, Brown the Bully & Age is just a Number: Politics Decoded
- Who cares about the EU anyway? More bottling and the Lib Dem Leaderzzzz: Politics Decoded
- Salmond the Propaganda Minister, A Glimpse in to the future? And The Royal End Game: Politics Decoded
- A new Beginning for Brown? The Polls & The Need for Debate: Politics Decoded
- The Political Initiative, The Evil Spin & The Greatest Show on Earth: Politics Decoded
- Darling Rocked, The Crying Calamity, Lady Luck & the Age old question
- Politics Decoded EXTRA: A Question or two for you Darling
- Labour Pains, Energy Gains & Lib Dem No Brains: Politics Decoded
- What to do with: Wendy Alexander, Party Funding & Christmas
- Bravo Gordon, Gordon gets it wrong, Gordon gets it right & the Greatest PM we never had (or were likely to have)
- The Spinning Disaster, Lib Dem Anti-Climax & Classic Headlines
- Mystic Garbo’s Predictions for 2008
- A Boris Banana Skin? A Tory Tester? A Knighthood Now!
- Livingstone & Clegg - a low point in their careers
- Shady dealing, An EU challenge & a surprising poll or two
- The Hangover of the Blair Years
- Cunning Clegg? Cheating Chambers?
- The Political Winds of Change are Blowing
- The New Mayor of London?! And cyclists
- Time for a change in Government or just Labour leader? - Politics Decoded with Garbo
- The Final Countdown: A Defining Moment in the Lives of Gordon and Dave - Politics Decoded with Garbo
- Six Months To Save Labour
- Bob Crow - London’s biggest scumbag: Politics Decoded with Garbo
- Citius, Altius, Fortius and Politicus
- It is not the Politicians who have failed democracy, it is we the people
- Who, exactly, is the more out of touch here? Politics Decoded with Garbo















I think the obsession with age is a media foible rather than an issue with the electorate. Ming misjudged the public mood and was ultimately, crap. It will now take a bold candidate to capture the public imagination and invigorate the Lib Dem image, not as youthful but as relevant.
I completely agree Wolfie - unfortunately when the media pick these things up and create a perception they somehow become fact. Now it will generally be accepted that a leader over 60 is not worth having - regardless of how good he or she is.
If Ming had been a great success all the headlines would be about how he is a mature and serious politician and that is what the electorate want - not your fancy young leaders obsessed with looking good and PR.
The bottom line is, as you point out, Ming was just no good regardless of his age.
[...] commented on the Politics Decoded column: Hague when he was leader seemed young in an obnoxious fashion- the 14 pint comment- and [...]
[...] Ming Campbell, aged 66 – too old for the job apparently and a complete failure. Vince Cable, aged 64 – doing a fine job and, to the detriment of the Lib Dems’ prospects, not standing for the full time job. Age has got nothing to do with and there is the proof – if you can do the job then you’re old or young enough. Ming just wasn’t good enough. [...]